What is real beauty?

A certain young man a rhetorician came to see Epictetus, with his hair dressed more carefully than was usual and his attire in an ornamental style; whereupon Epictetus said: Tell me you do not think that some dogs are beautiful and some horses, and so of all other animals. "I do think so," the youth replied. Are not then some men also beautiful and others ugly? "Certainly." Do we, then, for the same reason call each of them in the same kind beautiful, or each beautiful for something peculiar? And you will judge of this matter thus. Since we see a dog naturally formed for one thing, and a horse for another, and for another still, as an example, a nightingale, we may generally and not improperly declare each of them to be beautiful then when it is most excellent according to its nature; but since the nature of each is different, each of them seems to me to be beautiful in a different way. Is it not so? He admitted that it was. That then which makes a dog beautiful, makes a horse ugly; and that which makes a horse beautiful, makes a dog ugly, if it is true that their natures are different. "It seems to be so." For I think that what makes a pancratiast beautiful, makes a wrestler to be not good, and a runner to be most ridiculous; and he who is beautiful for the Pentathlon, is very ugly for wrestling. "It is so," said he. What, then, makes a man beautiful? Is that which in its kind makes both a dog and a horse beautiful? "It is," he said. What then makes a dog beautiful? The possession of the excellence of a dog. And what makes a horse beautiful? The possession of the excellence of a horse. What then makes a man beautiful? Is it not the possession of the excellence of a man? And do you, then, if you wish to be beautiful, young man, labour at this, the acquisition of human excellence. But what is this? Observe whom you yourself praise, when you praise many persons without partiality: do you praise the just or the unjust? "The just." Whether do you praise the moderate or the immoderate? "The moderate." And the temperate or the intemperate? "The temperate." If, then, you make yourself such a person, you will know that you will make yourself beautiful: but so long as you neglect these things, you must be ugly, even though you contrive all you can to appear beautiful.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sudinna Tale in the Pāli Vinaya and Its Interpretation

The tale of Sudinna, establishing the rule of celibacy for the Buddhist monastic order, has in recent years been the subject of intense investigation and reinterpretation, and much more is to be expected. I came across this story in the course of my research on the Abhidharma doctrines on sexual misconduct,1 and even though I agree with many authors that the tale contains important data for the Buddhist attitude towards sex, also for laypeople, I came to the conclusion that one purpose of the Vinaya rules needs to be considered more centrally: the preservation of the monastic community's public reputation. Methodologically, I primarily address the ideals set forth in the sources analyzed, the intentions of the authors and their literary tools for conveying those intentions. Another question is, then, to what extent the authors and their followers were ultimately able to live up to their ideals, in this case a puritan lifestyle in a society that was only partly supportive. The foc...
Read more

Ahimsa(Buddhism)

The principle of nonviolence included by the Buddha among his main teachings and regarded as of incomparable merit. Introduction The word  ahiṃsā  is a feminine noun formed by adding the negative prefix  a  to the word  hiṃsā , derived from the root  hiṃs  meaning “to kill” or “to injure.” In historic India, the concept of  ahiṃsā  was used for the first time by the authors of the  Chāndogya Upaniṣad  ([ 1 ], p. 17.4) in connection with the cruelty of Vedic  yajñas . Later, it was strongly advocated by the Buddha, who included it among his main teachings, provided it a theoretical basis, and regarded it as of incomparable merit. Rationality Behind Buddhist Position Concerning Ahiṃsā Buddhism believes that living beings live in a world of mutual injury where life can only be sustained by marginalizing others. Thus, it is not possible to literally uphold the principle of  ahiṃsā  as life in some forms has to be unavoida...
Read more

HE WHO SEES DHAMMA SEES DHAMMAS: DHAMMA IN EARLY BUDDHISM

The basic subject of the present article is the understanding of the concept of dharma in early Buddhist literature – in the Nik ayas/ Agamas and the early abhidhamma/abhidharma texts. As it is clear that early Buddhist texts were composed in some form of Middle Indic and as my main sources will be Pali texts I shall generally use the Pali Middle Indic form dhamma. 1 There are three basic problems that I think need to be considered in order to present a clear account of the distinctively Buddhist understanding of dhamma: (1) we need to establish the range of meanings found in early Buddhist literature; (2) we need to consider the relationship between those different meanings and how they evolved; (3) we need also to consider the relationship of the distinctively Buddhist usage of dhamma to the usage and understanding of dharma more generally in Indian literature and thought, and especially in early Brahmanical writings. These problems are, of course, not entirely separable. Clearly h...
Read more