Emanation
Lat. emanatio, “outflow,” translation of Gk ἀπορροή/ἀπόρροια (apórrhoḗ/apórrhoia), a keyword and figure of thought in the doctrinal structure of Gnosis/Gnosticism (in Irenaeus's Lat. trans. emissio: Haer. II 13.1–14.1 etc.). ¶ Probably inspired by Platonic thought, in the 3rd to 1st century bce Wis 7:25 calls wisdom an “emanation of the glory of the Almighty.” The image of the water that flows out of a spring as though through the terraced basins of a hellenistic fountain, graphic and yet not anthropomorphic, meets the strong need of gnostic authors to sketch quasi-genealogies and hierarchical series of abstract absolutes about diverse divinities, aeons, numbers, or essences down to the human soul; at the same time, they had in mind a path from light and purity to darkness and deterioration, which can be reversed through knowledge (cf. e.g. Pistis Sophia 10; Hippolytus, Haer. VI 36, 42; Mark, Valentinus). In addition, there was the (probably Iranian) idea of an antithesis between positive and negative emanations. Used rather sparingly by Plotinus (Ennead II 1.4.4; III 2.2.17, 4.3.25; V 2.1.8) because of the blurring of the boundary between the transcendent and the world, the concept of emanation was rejected in the christological dispute by Athanasius (after it had been accepted by e.g. Theognostus of Alexandria) because of the gnostic context and the risk of denigration (as well as exchangeability) of the person of Jesus (Symbolum 1.1; Ar. 1.21; etc.). In the early modern period the term was used by Nicholas of Cusa for the productions of the transcendent (De docta ignorantia II 27) and adopted by writers such as G. Bruno and G.W. Leibniz.
These corporeal metaphors should not be taken too seriously. Strictly, Plotinus denies that light, which is not corporeal, is an emanation (a flow; Enneads IV 5.7), and the point applies even more clearly to the Intellect and the Soul. It is not that any kind of matter is literally ¶ distributed more thinly through a preexistent medium: the place of forms (i.e. the Intellect) and of animate bodies (i.e. the world we now inhabit) ceaselessly come into and continue in their being by their response (or else, equivalently, by the higher reality's outgoing; cf. Plotinus, Enneads IV 3.9). Again, that outgoing may be inevitable, but it is not mindless: the God who is everywhere and nowhere is not just as he chanced to be, but as he willed (Enneads VI 8.16), and each and every thing in the All is as he would have willed it. We might reasonably say that he made it – if there ever was a time from which the universe began to be (Enneads VI 8.20). Nor is the One any less present even at the very edges of the light (Enneads IV 3.10). The point of the image is not that God is far away, but that he is here.
Philosophy of Religion
The metaphors used in later Platonic philosophy for the relation of the One to the Many include the spread of light, warmth, or perfume from a central source (Plotinus, Enneads V 1.6) or the overflowing of a fountain (Enneads III 8.10). In Plato's dialogue Timaeus, the universe is pictured as the work of a divine craftsman, in imitation of eternal archetypes sustained and illuminated by the Good. Most commentators chose to regard this as a convenient story, urging that the Intellect arose from the Good (or the One), the Soul from Intellect, and the world of nature from the Soul, not by any deliberate plan, but as the necessary consequence of the higher reality's nature. Those higher realities might not even know of the lower ones and are certainly not diminished, nor affected, by their reflection.These corporeal metaphors should not be taken too seriously. Strictly, Plotinus denies that light, which is not corporeal, is an emanation (a flow; Enneads IV 5.7), and the point applies even more clearly to the Intellect and the Soul. It is not that any kind of matter is literally ¶ distributed more thinly through a preexistent medium: the place of forms (i.e. the Intellect) and of animate bodies (i.e. the world we now inhabit) ceaselessly come into and continue in their being by their response (or else, equivalently, by the higher reality's outgoing; cf. Plotinus, Enneads IV 3.9). Again, that outgoing may be inevitable, but it is not mindless: the God who is everywhere and nowhere is not just as he chanced to be, but as he willed (Enneads VI 8.16), and each and every thing in the All is as he would have willed it. We might reasonably say that he made it – if there ever was a time from which the universe began to be (Enneads VI 8.20). Nor is the One any less present even at the very edges of the light (Enneads IV 3.10). The point of the image is not that God is far away, but that he is here.
Comments
Post a Comment